| A comic, first and foremost, should be self-explanatory. The reader should not have to click on a link to understand the comic. Secondly, it's not enough (usually) to just present the facts from the article in the form of a comic. One has to present the facts and then make some kind of funny or insightful comment about them. For example, if the GOP says X today, one can point out that they said Y yesterday (or last month or 100 years ago.) Or you could show what would ultimately be the logical consequences of X. Or you could take two seemingly unrelated stories, X and Z, and draw some kind of connection between them. This obviously requires a broad and deep knowledge of a lot of different subjects, and a memory for arcane and esoteric facts. It's not for everybody. Comedy is hard, satire
is nearly impossible. Especially these days. In may ways, we are living in the Silver Age of Satire, but the lag time is closing. Yesterday's satire can be tomorrow's headline. I started doing the footnotes because people assumed I was making up the entire thing. But comedy is not built on comedy. It has to have a foundation of some kind of perception of reality. It is OK to imitate (NOT plagiarize) when you start out. Hopefully, one eventually develops one's own style. I started out doing these comics for my own amusement. Then I went on the internets and I found other people similarly bent. The only people who criticized them were people who didn't understand them or thought that I in some way had taken away "their" limelight. It had nothing to do with politics. There was a guy who is as far right as I am left, and we belonged to a mutual admiration society. The point is, only bad writers want you to be bad, to make themselves look better. Good writers want you to be good. I'd love to see the comics page of gnomz filled with comics as good as DOONESBURY or BOONDOCKS. But you don't get good by spamming. You don't get good by making 1000 comics. You get good by making 1 comic 1000 times. That might be an exaggeration, but you've got to work on one 3-panel strip until you think it is absolutely perfect. Then get feedback on it and go back and edit it some more. Eventually you may find through feedback and brutally honest self-examination that you have no real talent for writing comedy. There's no shame in that as long as you don't spam. Comics need informed readers, too.
And I don't just like political comics. I like many different types, really anything well-written and funny. I especially like comics that do things that I find difficult to do, like be very silly (N.B. "Silly" does NOT mean "random". | |